|
Post by thomash on Nov 25, 2006 17:36:05 GMT -5
Why is the picture quality on WLGA so awful? On Knology, for example, you can see the same CW feed on 6 and 15, but the one from WLGA is horrible.
Is the DT picture any better or worse?
Also, how long is the national CW feed going to continue on cable? I imagine this is a holdover from the "WBG" affiliate operated out of WLTZ.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Slade on Nov 26, 2006 21:48:14 GMT -5
I think it looks bad on cable just because analog cable tends to degrade very easily. Especially the lower channels. Mine changes quality on cable from day to day. I got their analog signal very strong over the air. I'd say it was on par with the digital SD on the other stations. Never tried to get the digital because i'd have to get up on the roof and turn the antenna. And now that I have charter I don't have the OTA hooked up.
|
|
Bill
Junior Member
Posts: 57
|
Post by Bill on Dec 4, 2006 7:21:03 GMT -5
As of yesterday, I am now able to get a signal on Channel 66 DT. It's not HD, but at least it's a picture.
|
|